Love and Marriage…and the Government?

In response to my recent post The Right’s Response to Prop 8’s Rejection, Court Greene, a fellow former seminarian, had this to say on twitter:

"good post but go further. separation of church and state should have the govt out of marriage altogether"

This is a good question to ask. What should the role of the government in marriage, if any?

This is a conversation that Court and I have had before. The question that you may be asking is how do you get the government out of marriage altogether? My suggestion is to follow the example of other countries, like France, where the government oversees civil unions between couples. These civil unions confer all the rights that we think of when we think of rights of a married couple: the ability to see your spouse in the hospital, be on the same insurance, etc. Religious institutions could then perform marriage ceremonies if the couple chose.

This is a vastly different set up than what we currently have in America, but I do agree with Court that an appropriate separation of church and state would leave the state out of the marriage aspect of a couple. This way, religious institutions could define “marriage” however they chose and refuse to marry certain people if they chose to, but the rights that are currently reserved for opposite-sex couples in the majority of this country would be rightly given to all couples. I don’t realistically see this happening in this country, but I do think that it would help the current situation.

What do you think? Would you support a proposal like this?

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Love and Marriage…and the Government?

  1. 1. Marriage is a legal contract and therefore the government HAS TO BE INVOLVED in some way or other.

    2. I have no problem with some sort of law that allows ALL COUPLES the rights conferred by the legal contract of marriage that also upholds the religious freedom of religious institutions (i.e. allows churches to refuse to marry homosexuals). However, I don’t see any reason homosexuals cannot refer to the legal agreement a couple commits to as “marriage” instead of a “civil union.” Marriage connotes some deeper, emotional, familial tie that “civil union” just doesn’t quite cover.

    3. As always, great post!

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s