Lawmakers are beginning to respond to the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords yesterday in Tucson, Arizona. In a CNN post today, Mark Preston talks about new legislation designed to protect members of congress and federal judges.
Rep. Robert Brady, D-Pennsylvania, said he will introduce legislation making it a federal crime for a person to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a Member of Congress or federal official.
Brady notes that both parties have used this type of violent rhetoric. What do you think? Is this a real need that will serve to take the necessary precautions against unintentionally inciting violence or is it a violation of free speech? Typically threats have not been protected by the First Amendment. Should “language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence a Member of Congress or a federal judge” also not be protected under the First Amendment (emphasis mine)?