If you follow me on twitter, then you know I have strong opinions about the current debt ceiling increase debate that is going on in Washington, D.C. I am disgusted by the political posturing that has been going on by both sides. Nevertheless, I do not believe one can be honest and not speak of just how far to the right the conversations have moved. Republicans are now fighting against Democratic-sponsored bills that are more conservative and cut more spending than Republican bills introduced not that long ago.
So, in all of this I have realized how one-sided all of my tweets have sounded (been?). Part of me wants to apologize for that, but more of me believes it is important to be completely honest about my views, beliefs, perspectives, etc., albeit in an intelligent and respectful manner.
This process has also made me realize once again how “liberal” has become a dirty word (Note: I realize that “conservative” has also become a dirty word to many people, but seeing as absolutely no one is accusing me of being “conservative” I thought I’d only talk about being “liberal”). I usually try to steer away from highly relative terms like “liberal,” “moderate,” and “conservative,” because they mean something different to each person using them, but I think it’s time to take back a word that was once highly revered.
So, yes, I am a “liberal,” but I like to think of myself as a “Kennedy Liberal.” Here is what John F. Kennedy had to say about being liberal:
I believe in human dignity as the source of national purpose, in human liberty as the source of national action, in the human heart as the source of national compassion, and in the human mind as the source of our invention and our ideas. It is, I believe, the faith in our fellow citizens as individuals and as people that lies at the heart of the liberal faith. For liberalism is not so much a party creed or set of fixed platform promises as it is an attitude of mind and heart, a faith in man’s ability through the experiences of his reason and judgment to increase for himself and his fellow men the amount of justice and freedom and brotherhood which all human life deserves
I believe also in the United States of America, in the promise that it contains and has contained throughout our history of producing a society so abundant and creative and so free and responsible that it cannot only fulfill the aspirations of its citizens, but serve equally well as a beacon for all mankind. I do not believe in a superstate. I see no magic in tax dollars which are sent to Washington and then returned. I abhor the waste and incompetence of large-scale federal bureaucracies in this administration as well as in others. I do not favor state compulsion when voluntary individual effort can do the job and do it well. But I believe in a government which acts, which exercises its full powers and full responsibilities. Government is an art and a precious obligation; and when it has a job to do, I believe it should do it. And this requires not only great ends but that we propose concrete means of achieving them.
Our responsibility is not discharged by announcement of virtuous ends. Our responsibility is to achieve these objectives with social invention, with political skill, and executive vigor. I believe for these reasons that liberalism is our best and only hope in the world today. For the liberal society is a free society, and it is at the same time and for that reason a strong society. Its strength is drawn from the will of free people committed to great ends and peacefully striving to meet them. Only liberalism, in short, can repair our national power, restore our national purpose, and liberate our national energies.
What do our opponents mean when they apply to us the label “Liberal?” If by “Liberal” they mean, as they want people to believe, someone who is soft in his policies abroad, who is against local government, and who is unconcerned with the taxpayer’s dollar, then the record of this party and its members demonstrate that we are not that kind of “Liberal.” But if by a “Liberal” they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people — their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties — someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a “Liberal,” then I’m proud to say I’m a “Liberal.”
There, I said it. Now I hope we can have meaningful discussions that do not merely repeat party talking points, but that show we are more than the labels put on us by others. I also hope that we can each own who we are, be proud of it, and live a life that strives for what we believe to be the best possible world for everyone.
Tonight, I, for one, am proud to say I’m a “Liberal.”