The Complexity of Memory

I have written before on how I believe memory is sacred and have shared Buechner’s thoughts on what it means to remember someone. I have recently read J.Z. Smith’s To Take Place: Toward Theory in Ritual and he has this to say about the relationship of memory to time and space:

So it is with memory; it is a complex and deceptive experience. It appears to be preeminently a matter of the past, yet it is as much an affair of the present. It appears to be preeminently a matter of time, yet it is as much an affair of space.

I do not know enough about cognitive processes to speak for any length of time about the re-presentative theory or any other theories of memory, but Smith is definitely on to something. He asks, for instance,

If memory of a past experience is, through the processes of memory, experienced only  in the present, how can that present memory be an awareness of the past?

Memory is a matter of the past, but is also very much a matter of the present. Thinking about memory this way may serve to confuse, but I think it also enriches memory and the process of remembering, especially in the sense Buechner talks about it.

Advertisements

One thought on “The Complexity of Memory

  1. You might be interested in Maurice Halbwach’s “On Collective Memory.” Beyond being simply brilliant, it has a chapter on memory and religious groups. I think I only read the first few chapters and that chapter that mentioned religious groups.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s